Aranya could have been a slideshow on elephants and the role they play in the forests. Because that’s what Prabhu Solomon, writer, and director of the film, wants to convey at the end. He tells us that their consumption is an excellent fertilizer that allows seeds to grow.
Without elephants, forests, as we know today, might seem very different. In this regard, there may not be a forest, which will affect precipitation, agriculture and our survival will be at stake.
That’s why we should all should be. It seems perfect, like a terrace. But then, how does it make a movie engaging this drama? The elephant, at best, can only trumpet.
How is the elephant in the elephant room in the forests? The old elephant is our apathy and greed, and the latter is a symbol of strength and power.
There are some staples of a film by Prabhu Solomon:
A lush green backdrop, a story of love, and an untreated passion. All this feature of his recent film, Aranya, who was also released to Tamil while Kaadan.
The liberation Hindi of the film, like Haathi Mother Saathi, was withdrawn because of the CVIV-19 case thrust. The star film Rana Dagguubati like Aranya holds the distinction of creating a forest alone.
Prabhu has modeled Aranya on the Jadav Payeng environmental activist, and the Rana look seems to be inspired by Yul Brynner’s character from the ten commandments. Aranya has devoted his life to transport his family inheritance to protect the forest and wildlife.
The Messiah is determined to deliver the wild animals of the claws. The greedy, inconsiderate, and irresponsible human civilization. The principle is clear, and we all have a fair idea of what will happen at the end. There are no surprises.
We know that Aranya will save the day by removing the wall that blocked:
The traditional passage is being used by the herd of elephants that are for generations now. We expect this to happen with a generous branch of action.
We want to see Aranya show his Tarzan-esque skills as he jumps from one tree to another, raises giant elephants, commands the respect of wild cats, and teaches a lesson to humans, who enter and encroach on What belongs to wildlife.
Instead, all we are getting is Aranya preaching the benefits of forest protection again and again. Maybe hoping that intruders would have a change of heart and leave them alone. In other words, the film is not satisfactory cinematographic.
And this is not the only fault of this movie. Prabhu Muddles a promising premise with a series of sub-plots. There is an angle on Naxalites’ movement. And how tribes are systematically targeted, persecuted, and displaced. Another sub-layer involves a forbidden romance between a woman Naxalite and math.
The relationship between Vishnu Vishal’s Singa, his elephant, and his uncle looks like a copy of Kumki, a film by Prabhu Solomon.
The raying qualities of Aranya are cinematography:
This gently captures the green stretch of the forest, the sound design of Resul Pookutty, which makes images of living forests, and, of course, the actor of Rana Dagguubati. The energy and conviction with which it plays Aranya is inspiring and marks an essential step in its evolution as an actor.
The film tries to empathize with the fate of forest towns and Aranya himself, who does not give up despite the chances against him. You can see the hard work that Rana has put in place, whether it is his body tongue or his way of winning in this state (it always seems to be in an anxiety state), to play the role.
And he trumpets his voice just until the end because no one does not likes or cares about elephants as much as he does. And then, everything goes down. What Vishnu Vishal does in this film. Or why Shriya Pilgaonkar seems to have only six lines talking throughout the movie.
Or why Anant Mahadevan has such a shallow role. It is probably easier to understand the fate of elephants in the forest than these characters in history.